Why the WIAA State Tournament Expansion Deserves Your Support

Why the WIAA State Tournament Expansion Deserves Your Support

As a veteran high school basketball coach in Wisconsin, I’ve seen the joy and heartbreak this game brings. I’ve also seen deserving teams fall short of a state tournament berth due to limited spots. That’s why I support the proposed WIAA State Tournament Expansion. This plan gives more kids a chance to experience the magic of March in Madison. It is time to evolve the system to better serve our student-athletes, schools, and communities.

What the WIAA State Tournament Expansion Proposes

The WIAA State Tournament Expansion plan increases the number of qualifying teams in each division from four to eight. It still maintains five divisions but divides the state into eight true sectionals. Teams would play quarterfinal games on Wednesday, using three sites across the state. Two of those games would take place Thursday morning at the Kohl Center. Semifinals and finals would continue from Thursday afternoon through Saturday. The majority of the tournament structure stays the same.

This proposal is not rushed or random. It is the result of serious discussions by the WIAA Basketball Coaches Advisory Committee. These coaches understand the importance of state tournament access. They believe that expanding the field makes the event stronger, fairer, and more exciting.

Why Expansion Makes Sense

1. Fairness and Representation

Right now, Wisconsin qualifies fewer teams than other states with similar or smaller populations. That simply doesn’t make sense. Consider the numbers below:

StatePopulationSchoolsState Qualifiers (Boys/Girls)% Boys at State% Girls at State
Iowa3.2M35232 Boys / 40 Girls9%11%
Minnesota5.7M40432 Boys / 32 Girls8%8%
Wisconsin5.9M48720 Boys / 20 Girls4%4%

Despite having more schools than both Iowa and Minnesota, Wisconsin offers fewer state spots. That is a missed opportunity. Expanding the tournament would bring us in line with our neighbors. It would also allow teams from all corners of the state to compete.


Win the Season

2. More Opportunities Means More Engagement

When more teams qualify, more players stay invested longer. That helps with retention, development, and team culture. It gives athletes a reason to keep pushing. It motivates underclassmen to dream big. That’s something we all saw with the recent 2025 tournament, as evidenced by the Tournament Superlatives and All-Tournament Team.

For girls’ basketball, this is especially important. Participation numbers are down in many areas. This plan gives schools and coaches another tool to grow interest. Parents and fans will travel to support their teams. Communities will rally behind programs chasing a state bid.

Every school benefits when more students feel seen, valued, and part of something bigger. Expanded access can help achieve that.

3. Increased Visibility and Revenue

State tournament expansion creates more meaningful games. That means more fans in the stands, more ticket sales, more local news coverage, and more digital content to share and promote.

Schools would benefit financially from deeper tournament runs. Businesses near regional and sectional sites would see increased traffic. And broadcasters could showcase more talent across the state. That boosts the reputation of Wisconsin high school basketball.

The WIAA already has media partners in place. They are open to working within this expanded format. This is a chance to make the tournament even more of a statewide event.

4. Better Competitive Balance

Right now, many schools get moved between sectionals each year. That causes confusion and frustration. It breaks up traditional rivalries and increases travel.

The proposed plan divides the state into eight permanent sectionals. This creates consistency and fairness. It gives teams a clearer path to state. Coaches can plan and build their schedules with more confidence.

Each part of the state gets better representation. That matters in a state as geographically large and diverse as Wisconsin.

Coaches Overwhelmingly Approve

In a recent survey of over 400 coaches, over 90 percent voted in favor of the expansion proposal. These are the men and women in the gym every day. They see the limitations of the current system. Their support shows that this idea has real momentum.

When that many coaches agree, it’s worth paying attention. The WIAA State Tournament Expansion is not a fringe idea. It is a widely supported improvement that addresses real concerns.

A Smart, Realistic Plan

This proposal is not a patch job. It is a well-organized plan that uses existing infrastructure. The Wednesday quarterfinal games can be held at neutral sites across the state. The Thursday morning games at the Kohl Center would allow the rest of the schedule to stay in place.

The plan preserves what makes the state tournament special. It simply makes it more accessible. That’s good for players, coaches, parents, and fans. It also aligns with our educational mission of inclusion and opportunity.

Final Thoughts: Let’s Open the Door

For years, we’ve told our student-athletes to dream big and work hard. But the door to the state tournament has stayed small. It’s time to change that.

The WIAA State Tournament Expansion is thoughtful, fair, and long overdue. It will showcase more teams, energize communities, and grow the game in all the right ways.

I urge coaches, administrators, parents, and fans to support this proposal. Talk to your athletic directors. Reach out to WIAA leadership. Share the petition. Let’s give more kids a chance to experience the Kohl Center spotlight.

Together, we can make Wisconsin high school basketball stronger than ever.

Latest Posts

How to Save High School Basketball (HSB)

How to Save High School Basketball (HSB)

All organizational failure begins, and ends, with leadership failure.

Some predict the death of high school basketball in 10-years; I believe this is definitely true in girls BB especially, and most likely true in boys hoops. To save HSB, the most important place to begin is at the top, the Athletic Director (AD). The AD must create and staff a new position, to report direct to AD, called a Development Program Director (DPD). The DPD is also matrixed to the respective girls and boys high school basketball head coaches.

The DPD is a heavy part-time job, set forth on the ECA schedule as is the case with most sports positions within a school corporation. The role of DPD is to be fully funded by the school board. The work of the DPD is 4-fold: First, to bring new kids into the sport, beginning in 3rd grade. Second, to recruit and train volunteer parent-coaches. Third, to create an area league of teams in which student-athletes play competitive, organized team ball. And, fourth, to align the sports teams generally to the style of play of the sitting head coaches. I note “generally” because the key is player development, not running systems or memorized plays. Kids need to be trained as athletes, not programmed as robots.

The greatest weakness of AAU basketball can become the greatest strength of school-based basketball—the development of player skills, which are essential to improvement and advancement in higher levels of competition in this sport. This AAU does not do, or at least, does not do well. Sadly, many school systems are failing also in this crucial piece of basketball. Yet with simple adjustments, schools can reclaim this high ground.

The challenge is to bring players into the sport, then to train them in creative ways to get them to know how to play each position on the court, in defense, in offense, in transition, in full court press situations, and on the free throw line. This starts with the philosophy to build each kid from the court-up, on how to stand, how to pivot, how to dribble, how to screen, how to play helpside defense, etc.

Schools must reclaim the mantle of being basketball development experts. If we in schools do this, we will save our school teams (and jobs). If not, we will soon lose this entire sport to private clubs, and private trainers.

The basketball DPD must continually cast his/her net broad to find, then develop, volunteer parent-coaches. I suggest USA Basketball youth coaching licensure program as a place to start, though the customer service of USAB is among the very worst. Joining Positive Coaching Alliance and National Association of Youth Sports are good ideas, as is joining solid basketball coaching websites like teachhoops.com.

The state of Indiana boasts the largest girls travel basketball program in the country. Called Indy Girls Hoops League, it may serve as an excellent model for forming a similar league in your area of the country. Teams run from 3rd-8th grades, with three levels of competition (A (best), B, C(weakest)) in each grade. All girls on an IGHL team must be from the same school corporation (to keep from recruiting players to your team from outside your school district). Games are officiated by real referees. Teams play every other Sunday, and there is a Fall League, Winter League, and Spring League (a team can play in 1, 2 or all 3 of these if they wish). Almost all teams are coached by parents.

With IGHL there are generally 2 models followed by school systems. Either the school system “owns” its IGHL teams and appoints subordinate coaches, while dishing out gym times at area schools. Or, parents do their own thing, while wearing the name of that school corporation on the kids’ jerseys. Each model has its strengths and weaknesses.

The second major requirement to save HSB is to professionalize and broaden the skill sets of subordinate middle school coaches, many of whom have been coaching the same school grade teams for many, many years. Schools must eliminate family members of coaches from becoming assistant coaches, as this is leading to a death spiral of poor quality in middle school basketball. The DPD can create a basketball curriculum across grades, based on LTAD in Canada or the work of USA Basketball. Practice plans can then be organized from the curriculum. Also, player development and mastery of skills can be recorded each year in a simple, digital format. Statistics can be kept, and videos taken of practice and/or games.

The DPD must also use all means permitted within your state’s high school athletic association, to make basketball fun again, particularly outside traditional “basketball season.” This includes 3-v-3 tournaments, particularized clinics taught inside area elementary schools, basketball sleepovers with high school players inside a high school gym, field trips to area places of basketball interest, and special guest speaker events hosted with other school systems of current players at the collegiate and professional levels. I also advocate aggressive use of college tours, and behind the scenes player meetings with college players in your area.

Other local efforts of the DPD include branding and merchandising your school program, hosting special tournaments for other teams to come to your facilities, and creating buzz for your school system’s combined basketball programs through social media. I suggest the DPD not be a coach, but instead someone whose skills sets range from project manager on one side, to marketing and sales guru on the other. Coaches, I find, are too limited by ancient thought forms, and narrow, crabbed definitions of team, player and program.

The point is to make HSB (and MSB and ESB—i.e., middle school & elementary schools) the greatest developer of basketball players in the world. If we do this, we will save high school ball. I frankly do not care if our players wish to play AAU after us; I just want them to be able to, should they so decide.

Terry Boesch is a teacher in Martinsville, IN (home of John Wooden), and also coaches girls basketball. Feel free to email him at [email protected], or call/text at 317.643-6042

Free Video Series

Enter your email address to gain access to our FREE video series.

basketball blitz offense

You have Successfully Subscribed!